Sunday, July 20, 2008

interesting stats

Why Do Politicians and The Main Stream Media Distort the Numbers? Military Deaths!

Military losses, 1980 through 2006

These are some rather eye-opening facts.


Since the start of the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan, the sacrifice has been enormous. In the time period from the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 through today, we have lost over 3,000 military personnel to enemy action and accidents



As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed Forces is, consider the following statistics: The annual fatalities of military members while actively serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006:

1980 ........ 2,392
1981 ......... 2,380
1984 ......... 1,999
1988 .......... 1,819
1989 .......... 1,636
1990 ....... 1,508
1991 .......... 1,787
1992 .......... 1,293
1993 .......... 1,213
1994 .......... 1,075
1995 ...........2,465
1996 ......... 2,318 Clinton years @14,000 deaths
1997 .......... 817
1998 ......... 2,252
1999 .......... 1,984
2000 .......... 1,983
2001 .......... 890
2002 .......... 1,007
2003 ........ 1,410
2004 .......... 1,887
2005 ...... 919
2006.......... 920 Bush years (2001-2006): 7,033 deaths

If you are confused when you look at these figures, so was I.

Do these figures mean that the loss from the two latest conflicts in the Middle East are LESS than the loss of military personnel during Mr. Clinton 's presidency; when America wasn't even involved in a war? And, I was even more confused; when I read that in 1980, during the reign of President (Nobel Peace Prize winner) Jimmy Carter, there were 2,392 US military fatalities!

These figures indicate that many members of our Media and our Politicians will pick and choose. They present only those "facts" which support their agenda-driven reporting. Why do so many of them march in lock-step to twist the truth? Where do so many of them get their marching-orders for their agenda?

Our Mainstream Print and TV media, and many Politicians like to slant; that these brave men and women, who are losing their lives in Iraq, are mostly minorities! Wrong AGAIN! Just one more media lie!



The latest census, of Americans, shows the following distribution of American citizens, by Race:
European descent (White) ...... 69.12%
Hispanic ........................................ 12.5%
Black............................................ 12.3%
Asian ............................................... 3.7%
Native American .......................... . ..1.0%
Other ............................................ ... 2.6%

Now.. here are the fatalities by Race; over the past three years in Iraqi Freedom:

European descent (white) ...... 74.31%
Hispanic .................................... 10.74%
Black ........................................ 9.67%
Asian ........................................... 1.81%
Native American ........................ 1.09%
Other ........................................... . 0.33%

You do the Math! These figures don't lie, but, Media-liars figure and they sway public opinion !



(These statistics are published by Congressional Research Service, and they may be confirmed by anyone at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf )

Now ask yourself two questions:

"Why does the mainstream Print and TV Media never print statistics like these?" and
"Why do the mainstream media hate the (world wide) web as much as they do?"

Submitted by Roy B.
reposted from its a very interesting bit of information

11 comments:

Leonard^Bloom said...

It's not the first time facts have been distorted, and it certainly will not be the last; I generally do not use national media sources. I'm very confused by the media's numbers on the race issue, because it doesn't even make sense to slant those numbers. I don't see very much outrage over who dies where, and from what race. Overall though, the number of causalities are horrible, and war is not needed.

Betacommand said...

yet we have fewer deaths in war than we have had prior in peace time.

RC-0722 said...

75% of all charts, graphs, and statistics can be made to distort the facts 50% of the time. :)

Betacommand said...

Look them up your self Numbers cannot lie

Leonard^Bloom said...

Betacommand: an almost laughable problem is that although numbers don't lie, how can you trust that will give you the numbers?

Chet Long said...

I was quite baffled to look at those numbers and see that the Iraq and Afghan wars caused less casualties than the previous years, but it doesn't surprise me that the media would lie about the facts. However I still don't think we need to be in Iraq, if not for any other reason than the fact that we are spending billions of dollars over there each month, while our economy is sinking, and gas prices continue to rise.

RC-0722 said...

Have you seen gas prices lately? Also, those casualties look small compared to most of the other wars that have lasted this long (e.g. WW2).

Leonard^Bloom said...

RC-0722: This war, in relation to any other war, I do not think, justifies it. It may not be your intention, but comment almost seems like its small casualty count justifies it. I could be wrong though. In the end though, I do not support this war.

RC-0722 said...

You misunderstood me. I am not justifying the war by the casualty count, I am just stating the simple fact that compared to wars of similar length, the casualty count is extremely low.

Leonard^Bloom said...

Okay. Sorry for the confusion.

Diligent Terrier said...

Certainly, numbers don't lie. I'm surprised this is the first time I've heard of these stunning numbers.